Research at Children’s and UAB shows that keeping premature infants on CPAP longer may improve lung growth.
Research at Children’s of Alabama and the University of Alabama at Birmingham suggests that keeping premature babies on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) longer than currently practiced could significantly improve respiratory outcomes, potentially changing how neonatologists approach respiratory care for the smallest patients.
Early use of CPAP is standard for preterm infants unable to breathe on their own. It helps avoid invasive ventilation and minimizes the risk of lung injury while also increasing lung volume, which could stimulate lung growth and development.
Children’s neonatologist Zaki Yazdi, M.D., conducted a pilot study as part of his fellowship to see whether extending CPAP beyond traditional stopping points benefited premature infants. Yazdi’s study, published in Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, showed that continuing CPAP reduced episodes of drops in heart rate and oxygen levels in preterm infants. These positive findings align with groundbreaking research published this year in the American Journal of Critical Care Medicine, suggesting that extending CPAP promotes lung growth in babies born prematurely.
“We know CPAP helps premature babies with respiratory distress syndrome and apnea of prematurity,” Yazdi said. “The question we were trying to answer was: When is the best time to stop CPAP? We hypothesized that if you were to continue CPAP for a 24-hour period instead of going down to nasal cannula, you would have fewer drops in your oxygen level.”
Yazdi and the Children’s neonatology team, including neonatologist Colm P. Travers, M.D., randomized 36 infants born before 34 weeks gestation to either stop CPAP when they met Children’s traditional criteria (minimal oxygen support and few apnea episodes) or continue for an additional 24 hours. The primary outcomes were oxygen levels and other vital sign changes.
Babies who remained on CPAP an additional 24 hours experienced significantly fewer episodes of intermittent hypoxemia—defined as oxygen saturation below 85% for 10 seconds or longer—compared to those transitioned to low-flow nasal cannula. The CPAP group also had fewer heart rate drops and spent less time with low oxygen saturations.
“Even though all the markers we traditionally look at say this baby should be ready to come off CPAP, perhaps there are some more subtle things that we wouldn’t normally pick up on that suggest staying on CPAP could be helpful,” Yazdi said.
Extended CPAP isn’t without risks. Prolonged treatment can delay oral feeding, since many hospitals avoid feeding babies while on CPAP. There’s also risk of nasal breakdown from the CPAP mask interface, increased costs, and potential complications like feeding intolerance from swallowing air. However, Yazdi’s study found no negative effects during the 24-hour extension period.
The team has now received funding from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development’s Neonatal Research Network to perform a much larger study examining extended CPAP’s effects on lung development. The multicenter, randomized clinical trial—led by UAB—will involve approximately 860 babies. Unlike Yazdi’s 24-hour study, neonates randomized to the longer CPAP arm will remain on the support for at least two weeks or until they are 34 weeks post-menstrual age. The children will then be followed for two years to assess lung function development and long-term respiratory outcomes, making it the largest controlled trial of extended CPAP to date.
Already, Yazdi said, he and other neonatologists have noticed “a little bit of creep” toward keeping babies on CPAP longer at Children’s and other institutions.
“I don’t think we’re ready to say that this is definitely the best way to go yet,” Travers said. “But preliminary data that’s very promising suggests we need to do this larger trial to see if there’s any long-term benefit.”
“This could redefine what the standard of care could be,” Yazdi said.
No Comments